2010 Activity report

Scientific Foundations

With regards to the progress that has been made in anatomy, neurobiology, physiology, imaging, and behavioral studies, computational neuroscience offers a unique interdisciplinary cooperation between experimental and clinical neuroscientists, physicists, mathematicians and computer scientists. It combines experiments with data analysis and functional models with computer simulation on the basis of strong theoretical concepts and aims at understanding mechanisms that underlie neural processes such as perception, action, learning, memory or cognition.

Today, computational models are able to offer new approaches of the complex relations between the structural and the functional level of the brain thanks to models built at several levels of description. In very precise models, a neuron can be divided in several compartments and its dynamics can be described by a system of differential equations. The spiking neuron approach proposes to define simpler models concentrated on the prediction of the most important events for neurons, the emission of spikes. This allows to compute networks of neurons and to study the neural code with event-driven computations.

Larger neuronal systems can be considered when the unit of computation is defined at the level of the population of neurons and when rate coding is supposed to bring enough information. Studying Dynamic Neural Fields consequently lays emphasis on information flows between populations of neurons (feedforward, feed-back, lateral connectivity) and is well adapted to defining high-level behavioral capabilities related for example to visuomotor coordination.

Furthermore, these computational models and methods have strong implications for other sciences (e.g. computer science, cognitive science, neuroscience) and applications (e.g. robots) as well . In computer science, they promote original modes of distributed computation; in cognitive science, they have to be related to current theories of cognition; in neuroscience, their predictions have to be related to observed behaviors and measured brain signals.

Microscopic level: spiking neurons and networks

Computational neuroscience is also interested in having more precise and realistic models of the neuron and especially of its dynamics. We consider that the latter aspect can not be treated at the single unit level only; it is also necessary to consider interactions between neurons at the microscopic scale.

On one hand, compartmental models describe the neuron at the inner scale, through various compartments (axon, synapse, cellular body) and coupled differential equations, allowing to numerically predict the neural activity at a high degree of accuracy. This, however, is intractable if analytic properties are to be derived, or if neural assemblies are considered. We thus focus on phenomenological punctual models of spiking neurons, in order to capture the dynamic behavior of the neuron isolated or inside a network. Generalized conductance based leaky integrated and fire neurons (emitting action potential, i.e. spike, from input integration) or simplified instantiations are considered in our group.

On the other hand, one central issue is to better understand the precise nature of the neural code. From rate coding (the classical assumption that information is mainly conveyed by the firing frequency of neurons) to less explored assumptions such as high-order statistics, time coding (the idea that information is encoded in the firing time of neurons) or synchronization aspects. At the biological level, a fundamental example is the synchronization of neural activities, which seems to play a role in olfactory perception: it has been observed that abolishing synchronization suppresses the odor discrimination capability. At the computational level, recent theoretical results show that the neural code is embedded in periodic firing patterns, while, more generally, we focus on tractable mathematical analysis methods coming from the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems.

For both biological simulations and computer science emerging paradigms, the rigorous simulation of large neural assemblies is a central issue. Our group is at the origin, up to our best knowledge, of the most efficient even-based neural network simulator, based on well-founded discrete event dynamic systems theory, and now extended to other simulation paradigms, thus offering the capability to push the state of the art on this topic.

Mesoscopic level: dynamic neural field

Our research activities in the domain of computational neurosciences are also interested in the understanding of higher brain functions using both computational models and robotics. These models are grounded on a computational paradigm that is directly inspired by several brain studies converging on a distributed, asynchronous, numerical and adaptive processing of information and the continuum neural field theory (CNFT) provides the theoretical framework to design models of population of neurons.

This mesoscopic approach underlines that the number of neurons is very high, even in a small part of tissue, and proposes to study neuronal models in a continuum limit where space is continuous and main variables correspond to synaptic activity or firing rates in population of neurons. This formalism is particularly interesting because the dynamic behavior of a large piece of neuronal tissue can be studied with differential equations that can integrate spatial (lateral connectivity) and temporal (speed of propagation) characteristics and display such interesting behavior as pattern formation, travelling waves, bumps, etc.

The main cognitive tasks we are currently interested in are related to the autonomous navigation of a robot in an unknown environment (perception, sensorimotor coordination, planning). The corresponding neuronal structures we are modeling are part of the cortex (perceptive, associative, frontal maps) and the limbic system (hippocampus, amygdala, basal ganglia). Corresponding models of these neuronal structures are defined at the level of the population of neurons and functioning and learning rules are built from neuroscience data to emulate the corresponding information processing (filtering in perceptive maps, multimodal association in associative maps, temporal organization of behavior in frontal maps, episodic memory in hippocampus, emotional conditioning in amygdala, selection of action in basal ganglia). Our goal is to iteratively refine these models, implement them on autonomous robots and make them cooperate and exchange information, toward a completely adaptive, integrated and autonomous behavior.

Connectionist parallelism

Connectionist models, such as neural networks, are the first models of parallel computing. Artificial neural networks now stand as a possible alternative with respect to the standard computing model of current computers. The computing power of these connectionist models is based on their distributed properties: a very fine-grain massive parallelism with densely interconnected computation units.

The connectionist paradigm is the foundation of the robust, adaptive, embeddable and autonomous processings that we develop in our team. Therefore their specific massive parallelism has to be fully exploited. Furthermore, we use this intrinsic parallelism as a guideline to develop new models and algorithms for which parallel implementations are naturally made easier.

Our approach claims that the parallelism of connectionist models makes them able to deal with strong implementation and application constraints. This claim is based on both theoretical and practical properties of neural networks. It is related to a very fine parallelism grain that fits parallel hardware devices, as well as to the emergence of very large reconfigurable systems that become able to handle both adaptability and massive parallelism of neural networks. More particularly, digital reconfigurable circuits (e.g. FPGA, Field Programmable Gate Arrays) stand as the most suitable and flexible device for fully parallel implementations of neural models, according to numerous recent studies in the connectionist community. We carry out various arithmetical and topological studies that are required by the implementation of several neural models onto FPGAs, as well as the definition of hardware-targetted neural models of parallel computation.

This research field has evolved within our team by merging with our activities in behavioral computational neuroscience. Taking advantage of the ability of the neural paradigm to cope with strong constraints, as well as taking advantage of the highly complex cognitive tasks that our behavioral models may perform, a new research line has emerged that aims at defining a specific kind of brain-inspired hardware based on modular and extensive resources that are capable of self-organization and self-recruitment through learning when they are assembled within a perception-action loop.

The embodiment of cognition

Recent theories from cognitive science stress that human cognition emerges from the interactions of the body with the world. Through motor actions, the body can orient toward objects to better perceive and analyze them. The analysis is performed on the basis of physical measurements and more or less elaborated emotional reactions of the body, generated by the stimuli. This will elicit other orientation activities of the body (approach and grasping or avoidance). This elementary behavior is made possible by the capacity, at the cerebral level, to coordinate the perceptive representation of the outer world (including the perception of the body itself) with the behavioral repertoire that it generates either on the physical body (external actions) or on a more internal aspect (emotions, motivations, decisions). In both cases, this capacity of coordination is acquired from experience and interaction with the world.

The theory of the situatedness of cognition proposes to minimize representational contents (opposite to complex and hierarchical representations) and privileges simple strategies, more directly coupling perception and action and more efficient to react quickly in the changing environment.

A key aspect of this theory of intelligence is the Gibsonian notion of affordance: perception is not a passive process and, depending on the current task, objects are discriminated as possible �tools� that could be used to act in the environment. Whereas a scene full of details can be memorized in very different and costly ways, a task-dependent description is a very economical way that implies minimal storage requirements. Hence, remembering becomes a constructive process.

For example with such a strategy, the organism can keep track of relevant visual targets in the environment by only storing the movement of the eye necessary to foveate them.We do not memorize details of the objects but we know which eye movement to perform to get them: The world itself is considered as an external memory.

Our agreement to this theory has several implications for our methodology of work. In this view, learning emerges from sensorimotor loops and a real body interacting with a real environment are important characteristics for a learning protocol. Also, in this view, the quality of memory (a flexible representation) is preferred to the quantity of memory.


By year

By type